Mykola Hvyliovyi and Artem Sokil: a dialogue between the authors and works.

Abstract

The article is an attempt to compare N. Hvylyovyi’s «Valdshnepy» modern story Artem Socol «Aglaya» as an alternative continuation of the progress of the novel. The study examined and compared the views of scientists who reacted differently to the phenomenon of the emergence of the second part of the long N. Hvylyovyi’s novel destroyed, marked the views of both supporters of this work (V.Gzhitsky, R. Semko, O. Mamon et al.), and those who are critical of the definition of the story as a continuation of the «Valdshnepy» (R. Chopik, Yuri Lavrinenko, A. Stusenko t al.). The features of the genre interpretation «Aglaya» , because the product is perhaps the first attempt at writing yet undeveloped in Ukrainian literature genre storycontinuation-story controversy, half-effaced time palimpsest. The article first attempt to submit a detailed analysis of the story Artem Sokol (as opposed to Hnyliovyi’s «Valdshnepy») at different levels: spatial (mapped areas in which the action takes place works, the year in which hint topical political events), Scene (author the story is trying to stick to a maximum of style and N. Hvylyovyi recreate some plot threads that will combine story-continued from the destroyed part of the novel) shaped. Thus, the image is already mapped to the old Aglaia her son Dmitri, a new generation; Aglaia with her late father Dmitri Karamazov; traitor and murderer Vovchik friend, his wife and son of Claudia Roller; former peasant Odarka). In the product can be traced and analyzed the eternal problem of fathers and children: the heroes of their parents identify with red past, from which those during the life sought after to get rid of the idea of the revival of a young nation, for which he was punished.